<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=150680908970065&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Sign In
Grade Your Portfolio

How Hargreaves Lansdown & Neil Woodford's Big money Relationship Cost Investors

Topic: Neil Woodford 5 July 2019

  • 46% of The Woodford Equity Income funds current value was raised through Hargreaves Lansdown.
  • Woodford Investment Management earned more than £54 million in fee income from the sale of their Equity income fund via Hargreaves Lansdown.
  • The LF Woodford Equity Income had returned losses of -31.35% over the past 2 years.
  • The LF Woodford Income Focus has returned losses of -22.43% since it launched in April 2017.

Since Neil Woodford stopped customers withdrawing money from his flagship fund at the start of June 2019, investors have shunned anything associated with the UK’s highest-profile fund manager. But few have been hit harder than Hargreaves Lansdown, the country’s largest investment fund supermarket.

The company has been one of Woodford’s biggest supporters regularly recommending his funds to their 1.2 million clients, and even holding sizeable shares in them through their popular range of Multi-Manager funds.

The fallout has led to MPs demanding Hargreaves Lansdown detail the financial extent of their relationship with Woodford, asking questions as to why they continued to promote Woodford’s funds even though they have consistently been the worst performers in their sector.

In this report, we look into the fees both Hargreaves Lansdown and Neil Woodford generated through their relationship and how much investing in Woodford’s funds has cost investors.

The Importance of Hargreaves Lansdown For Neil Woodford

In 2015, the first full calendar year for Woodford Equity Income, Hargreaves Lansdown clients owned 38%, or £3.1 billion, of the fund. By 2016, that had risen to £3.4 billion, even though their relative stake in the fund had dipped to 36% after the fund had a strong early run of performance.

In 2017, Woodford endured a torrid year, falling to the bottom of the Investment Association’s UK Equity Income sector which prompted the first wave of withdrawals from his flagship fund.

Hargreaves Lansdown clients pulled £1 billion from the fund, at a faster rate than Woodford’s other investors. But such is the broker’s scale, and the inflows it had already driven, that at £2.2 billion their clients’ stakes still represented 28% of the fund’s assets.

During the initial 3 years, Woodford would have generated roughly £50 million in fee revenue from Hargreaves Lansdown clients alone.

For Woodford’s Income Focus fund, Hargreaves Lansdown’s influence is more alarming. Their clients owned roughly 75% of the then £703 million valued fund as of January past.

Hargreaves Lansdown’s backing of Woodford funds is so significant that, unlike any other broker, they are deemed a ‘related party’ in that it controls more than 20% of the shares, and must disclose holdings in its annual reports.

New call-to-action

Woodford Investment Management Earned £54million from Hargreaves Lansdown Sales

Sales of the Woodford Equity Income fund through fund supermarket Hargreaves Lansdown earned Neil Woodford's fund management firm more than £54 million in fee income. The annual fee revenue generated began to fall in 2016 as the fund began to underperform and the first significant outflows started.

Despite the fund's decline, fee income was still significant, especially when taking into account the fund itself had consistently been one of the worst performing funds in its sector and returned losses since its inception.

Woodford Fee Income

Hargreaves Lansdown Clients Account For 46% of The Woodford Equity Income Funds Total FUM

The total number of Hargreaves Lansdown clients exposed to Woodford’s Equity Income fund is 291,520. These clients have either invested in the fund directly through the Hargreaves Lansdown platform, or indirectly as a result of investing in one of Hargreaves Lansdown’s Multi-Manager fund’s which hold shares in the Woodford Equity Income fund.

Collectively, the total exposure of Hargreaves Lansdown’s clients to the Woodford Equity Income fund is £1,619 million. For Hargreaves Lansdown, this represents under 1.7% of total assets under their administration, but for Woodford, this is much more. The £1.6 Billion invested in his fund through Hargreaves Lansdown makes up 46% of the fund’s total assets under management, demonstrating how important Hargreaves Lansdown has been to Woodford Investment Management.


Hargreaves Lansdown Earn £41.1 million From LF Woodford Equity Income

Since the LF Woodford Equity Income fund launched in 2014 up to end of April 2019 Hargreaves Lansdown earned £41.1million from fee income generated from their clients purchasing the Equity Income fund through their platform.

HL Fee Income

Hargreaves Lansdown Wealth 50

The polarising Wealth 50 promoted funds list is a highly influential list of Hargreaves Lansdown’s favourite funds which they recommend to their base of 1,136,000 clients. Originally called the Wealth 150 it was replaced at the start of 2019 with the more condensed Wealth 50 list.

Explaining this more condensed list Hargreaves Lansdown’s research director Mark Dampier said that 90% of the more than 2500 unit trusts and other investment funds available to the public were “rubbish” with Hargreaves Lansdown believing very few funds are worth recommending. 

However, after the Woodford Equity Income fund suspension, greater emphasis was placed on Hargreaves Lansdown’s Wealth 50 with MP Nicky Morgan asking them to explain their selection process. In response, Hargreaves Lansdown said the selection process for their Wealth 50 list includes, a qualitative analysis of the manager’s process, philosophy, team support, incentivisation and portfolio construction. As well as, conducting more than 175 fund manager meetings a year.

Despite their selection process Hargreaves Lansdown have included both the Woodford Equity Income and Woodford Income Focus funds since their inception. These funds remained in the Wealth 50 list until 4th June 2019, when they were both removed after Woodford’s Equity Income fund was suspended.

Both of these funds have consistently performed at the bottom of their sectors and had demonstrated little prospect of recovery in the foreseeable future Neil Woodford himself warned in February 2018 to expect continued underperformance from his funds when he said, "We should all expect the environment to remain as challenging for the Woodford funds, as it has been since early summer last year.”

Regulator Concerns Over Recommended Fund Lists

When assessing the drivers for a recommendation of funds, the FCA found that funds affiliated with the platform are “significantly more likely to be added to the recommendation list than non-affiliated funds” while at the same time “are less likely to be deleted from recommendation lists”. The study also found that “recommended funds share a higher proportion of their revenues with the platforms than non-recommended funds”.

It is not just the regulator that has been critical of how these funds are selected. Terry Smith, a respected fund manager and founder of investment firm Fundsmith, recently voiced concerns over how Hargreaves Lansdown selects its recommended funds.

Smith was quoted in the Times as saying, “recommended funds continue to be chosen mainly for fund managers’ willingness to comply with a charging structure which enables Hargreaves Lansdown to maximise its own profitability, and not because they perform well for investors”.

New call-to-action

Heavy Losses For Investors

Anyone who invested £10,000 into Woodford Equity Income after it was controversially included in a Hargreaves Wealth 50 recommended funds list in January 2019 would have suffered losses of £1,214 after just 150 days. In contrast, Hargreaves Lansdown is estimated to have raked in an estimated £2.5m of fees on its clients’ investment in Woodford Equity Income since its Wealth 50 list was published on 9th January.

Although the Woodford Equity Income fund’s future is in jeopardy with the fund suspended upon sustained outflows from investors, it has earned both Woodford Investment Management and Hargreaves Lansdown significant fee revenue, particularly in the first years of the funds as unparalleled interest saw it amass funds under management of more than £10 billion in its first year.

Ultimately, the relationship between Woodford and Hargreaves has earned both sizeable fee income, but for investors, many of whom have stuck by Woodford on the recommendation of the Wealth 50, it has been the opposite. Over the recent 2 years, the Woodford Equity Income fund has returned huge losses of -31.35%. The LF Woodford Income Focus fund hasn’t fared much better, since its launch on 12th April 2017, it has returned losses of -22.42%.

Important Risk Warning

This article is not personal advice. This article gives information as to past performance of investments. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Always seek personal advice from an FCA regulated adviser such as Yodelar Investments. The value of investments will rise and fall, so you could get less that what you put in.


Back to Other Options

Thank You!

Search 100’s of fund manager reviews, articles and insights.

New call-to-action
New call-to-action

Yodelar Investment Services

With quality advice, you can Invest in funds that consistently rank in the top 25% of their sector, Discuss your needs with our expert advice team and receive a complete recommendation report.

Get started **Yodelar Investments are authorised and regulated by the Finanical Conduct Authority**
  • Receive a no-obligation investment and pension review
  • Receive a complete recommendation report
  • Receive a detailed pre and post-retirement cash flow plan